Defining the baseline for publication sharing

Recent blog posts by Bill Gasarch and improved version by Daniel Lemire are calling for an explicit manifesto to promote standard sharing practices: Store your work in an open archive such as arXiv; provide RSS feeds; Post improvements to your work; Make background material (slides) available; etc. An explicit manifesto would help to define the baseline and bring visibility. The discussion of the minimum recommendations is ongoing.

It is intriguing to consider an ever-evolving publication model where a manuscript can be constantly refined over time, referred to by version numbers. Peer-review is a key issue here. However, if the original author maintains responsibility, and the audience has a chance the comment on-line, in the PLoS One style, perhaps the problem of peer-review could be overcome. It is tempting to consider a culture of scientific publishing where the peer-reviewed publication marks the beginning of a refinement process, rather than an end.

Perhaps the publish-or-perish athmosphere in academic culture could be changed within the evolving publication landscape, where open publishing practices are providing new tools to advance quality and impact?


About antagomir
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s